<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Fish Gasping Moment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com</link>
	<description>media and musings of joshua mcveigh-schultz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First look at Facebook&#8217;s new Timeline features by dustin o'hara</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2011/09/24/first-look-at-facebooks-new-timeline-features/comment-page-1/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin o'hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=289#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>Hi Joshua,
It seems to me that the timeline introduces a concept of storytelling to the identity performance that fb has always required of its users. I think you can situate the timeline within a larger trend of narrative computing. Are you familiar with http://www.qwiki.com/q/Qwiki ? They say they&#039;re planning on allowing people to connect qwiki to their facebook and linkin profiles to create short narrative presentation about themselves. I agree that initially it seems to be at odds with the &quot;ephemerality &quot; of fb, but as you say it&#039;s a false sense to begin with. It&#039;s interesting that for sometime now many artists have framed their work within the context personal narrative, often blurring the distinction between the &#039;work&#039; and the story or the &#039;process&#039;. I often view my own creative efforts in this way. It seems to be a strategie that is becoming quite common... I suspect it should be discussed in terms of social capital. Anyways, I&#039;m definitely enjoying your posts, especially the next post where you highlight the various options facebook offers. Whenever I have one too many drinks at a party, I start to dive into a rant about how facebook&#039;s formal-technical definitions of friendship are reshaping our very notion of friendship. I imagine you might already come across it, but if not I&#039;ve really enjoyed the software studies book http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262062747intro1.pdf Warren Sack has an essay in it, I&#039;m not sure if you studied with Warren during your time at DANM but while I was there he held a software studies seminar that was great fun, I think the seminar website is still online with some interesting essays that might be good readings for the critique you&#039;re building. Cheers -D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joshua,<br />
It seems to me that the timeline introduces a concept of storytelling to the identity performance that fb has always required of its users. I think you can situate the timeline within a larger trend of narrative computing. Are you familiar with <a href="http://www.qwiki.com/q/Qwiki" rel="nofollow">http://www.qwiki.com/q/Qwiki</a> ? They say they&#8217;re planning on allowing people to connect qwiki to their facebook and linkin profiles to create short narrative presentation about themselves. I agree that initially it seems to be at odds with the &#8220;ephemerality &#8221; of fb, but as you say it&#8217;s a false sense to begin with. It&#8217;s interesting that for sometime now many artists have framed their work within the context personal narrative, often blurring the distinction between the &#8216;work&#8217; and the story or the &#8216;process&#8217;. I often view my own creative efforts in this way. It seems to be a strategie that is becoming quite common&#8230; I suspect it should be discussed in terms of social capital. Anyways, I&#8217;m definitely enjoying your posts, especially the next post where you highlight the various options facebook offers. Whenever I have one too many drinks at a party, I start to dive into a rant about how facebook&#8217;s formal-technical definitions of friendship are reshaping our very notion of friendship. I imagine you might already come across it, but if not I&#8217;ve really enjoyed the software studies book <a href="http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262062747intro1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262062747intro1.pdf</a> Warren Sack has an essay in it, I&#8217;m not sure if you studied with Warren during your time at DANM but while I was there he held a software studies seminar that was great fun, I think the seminar website is still online with some interesting essays that might be good readings for the critique you&#8217;re building. Cheers -D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redesign and the critique of critique by Michael Wesch: From Knowledgeable to Knowledge-Able &#124; The Fish Gasping Moment</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/11/21/redesign-and-the-critique-of-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wesch: From Knowledgeable to Knowledge-Able &#124; The Fish Gasping Moment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=225#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>[...] The Fish Gasping Moment   media and musings of joshua mcveigh-schultz    Skip to content HomeAboutRecent Work        &#8592; Redesign and the critique of critique [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Fish Gasping Moment   media and musings of joshua mcveigh-schultz    Skip to content HomeAboutRecent Work        &larr; Redesign and the critique of critique [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on spectacles, objects, and baby daddies by Civic Media — digesting the White Paper</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/01/17/spectacles-objects-and-baby-daddies/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Civic Media — digesting the White Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fishgaspingmoment.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-524</guid>
		<description>[...] would a public ritual of inquiry look like? I&#8217;ve considered this question in an earlier post (where I draw on Maury Povich&#8217;s Who&#8217;s Your Daddy? television show as an example of how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would a public ritual of inquiry look like? I&#8217;ve considered this question in an earlier post (where I draw on Maury Povich&#8217;s Who&#8217;s Your Daddy? television show as an example of how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Design Boost taking applications by IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 27th</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/07/27/mobile-design-boost-taking-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 27th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=196#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published Mobile Design Boost taking applications [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published Mobile Design Boost taking applications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Difference between Impartiality and Neutrality by IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 4th</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/07/03/the-difference-between-impartiality-and-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 4th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=190#comment-216</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published The Difference between Impartiality and Neutrality [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published The Difference between Impartiality and Neutrality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NPR&#8217;s economic coverage is hurting America by IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 4th</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/07/03/nprs-economic-coverage-is-hurting-america/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 4th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=186#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published NPR’s economic coverage is hurting America [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published NPR’s economic coverage is hurting America [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NPR&#8217;s economic coverage is hurting America by IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 4th</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/07/03/nprs-economic-coverage-is-hurting-america/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for July 4th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=186#comment-214</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published NPR’s economic coverage is hurting America [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published NPR’s economic coverage is hurting America [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adam Greenfield on read/write urbanism by IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for April 27th</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/04/26/adam-greenfield-on-readwrite-urbanism/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for April 27th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=184#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published Adam Greenfield on read/write urbanism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published Adam Greenfield on read/write urbanism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on some thoughts on prezi&#8230; by IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for April 7th</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/04/06/some-thoughts-on-prezi/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAP &#124; Daily Digest for April 7th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/?p=171#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published some thoughts on prezi… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh McVeigh-Schultz published some thoughts on prezi… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on spectacles, objects, and baby daddies by jody</title>
		<link>http://joshuamcveighschultz.com/2010/01/17/spectacles-objects-and-baby-daddies/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fishgaspingmoment.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-28</guid>
		<description>fascinating, I never really thought about why I love watching instant replays so much, but it&#039;s true that I always take a firm stance one way or the other and I want to see if I&#039;m right (or others I&#039;m watching with or the announcers are right). And after seeing the replay if the official still makes a bad call it&#039;s sooo much more infuriating, because the right call feels so cemented as fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating, I never really thought about why I love watching instant replays so much, but it&#8217;s true that I always take a firm stance one way or the other and I want to see if I&#8217;m right (or others I&#8217;m watching with or the announcers are right). And after seeing the replay if the official still makes a bad call it&#8217;s sooo much more infuriating, because the right call feels so cemented as fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

